I do not know if you have noticed it, but our great state is targeted on a regular basis. We are blamed for a variety of things from wolf hunts, the demise of the bear population, oil production, handing out dividends to our residents while not exercising a state income tax, pollution, disregard for the environment, excessive commercial fishing and any other popular cause that those who know better can conceive.
Reuters News on Monday, 10/2/06 published a story that is now blaming Alaska for the destruction of icebergs near Antarctica! You know, the one at the bottom of the earth, not our own North Pole at the top of the earth! A primary quote in the article is "One of the things we're debating in the world right now is whether global warming might increase the storms in the oceans." It was just recently published that because the water temperatures are warming is the reason that Florida has not had any hurricanes this season. Perhaps, our prognosticator should read from the same page.
However, to the point of the destruction of the Antarctica icebergs. According to this same article "A bad storm in Alaska last October (2005) generated an ocean swell that broke apart a giant iceberg near Antarctica six days later." Reportedly, the waves from this storm traveled the 8,300 miles to destroy the iceberg. Because of Alaska, iceberg B15A broke into half a dozen pieces. They summarized, that a storm in the Gulf of Alaska created waves of about 35 feet. Tracing these waves, they discovered from weather buoys that when these waves passed Hawaii they were about 15 feet in height.
Now I am no mathematical whiz kid, but our 50th state is less than half way to the Antarctica. The typical winter waves generated in Alaska had diminished by 20 feet when they passed Hawaii. Consequently, after traveling from Hawaii to the Antarctica, they would have decreased at a similar rate on the remaining 60% of the journey south. Upon their arrival in the Antarctica, they would have been a ripple on the water. I have made the transit around Cape Horn, there was a reason that all of our aircraft were put in the hanger bay to make the transit. Cape Horn is one of the most dangerous stretches of water in the world and known for their severe storms, to the south of these straits is the massive ice of Antarctica.
But regardless, Alaska got the blame once again. The researchers final quote is worth sharing, "We think that B15A was in the right position where these big waves would be fatal to it." MacAyeal said, "The iceberg shattered like a gracile wine glass being sung to by a heavy soprano." I think MacAyeal had a few to many wines glasses full of fruit punch when he conceived this blame game concept, besides, does he think all sopranos are heavy? That is really a profiling attitude.
However, just to be safe, perhaps we should cancel any planned winter storms in the Gulf of Alaska this year.
5 comments
The analysis of this research data that is provided by the author has plagued my thoughts all day, how accurate was their findings. They stated these giant wavesof 35 feet, which is normnalk for any storm inthe Gulf of Alaska traveled to the Antarctica, 8,300 miles awy in a time span of 6 days with enough velocity to shatter the giant iceberg. Calculations on this fact alone shows that the current was speeding along at 1,383.33 miles per day or at a rate of 57.64 miles per hour! Cross referencing this over to my softwaree program that has all of the tidal and current data for the west coast and Hawaii, I discover that the current speed in the Gulf of Alaska is approximately 1.75 miles per houronthe flood tide. When similar data is reviewed for Hawaii, of fthe coast of Maui, the current spped is approximatley .75 miles per hour on the flood tide. A far cry from the 57.64 mph that the reserchers had calculated, that is one fast wave - common sense prevails!
I think the LA "Storm" is heading south... I would have called to warn you but phone calls so late scare people.
Additional calculations: Those waves generated in Alaska that traveled to the Antarctica (8,300 miles)in six(6)days. If a Naval Battle group traveled the same course at Battle Speed (25 Knots) it would take 13.83 days to make the transit. If the Bull Moose made the same trip in his boat, it would take him 34.58 days at normal speed of his boat, if he were trolling the entire distance it would take him 138.33 days.
okay this blog is sounding entirely too much like an algebra equation...Seems to me that an iceberg in Antarctica probably broke apart from all the scientist drilling holes in it...or maybe it was the warm penguin pee...either way both sound more logical than that algebra equation your stressing your brain over.
Post a Comment
Contributors
- Stan Harrington
- Stan grew up fishing the rivers and marine waters of Cook Inlet since the 1950's. Retired from the U.S. Navy in 1983. Stan and his family owned and operated Anchor Angler Tackle Shop on Anchor River for twenty-two years. He was the host of the popular daily radio program, "Kenai Peninsula Sport Fishing Report" on radio stations KGTL, KPEN, and K-Wave for fifteen years. Stan retired from business in 2007 and continues to live in Anchor Point, Alaska.
Favorite Links
Archives
-
▼
2006
(220)
-
▼
October
(25)
- HAPPY HALLOWEEN
- Anchor River
- Pumpkin Carving Contest II
- Pumpkin Carving Contest
- Escapee
- Julian Calendar
- Political Season
- Look At these Hams
- Exploitation
- Homer Plumma Fishing Guide Service
- 20 Years Of Adventure
- My Day
- Monday Night Football
- Hole In The Wall Mystery
- "Butch" Is Exonerated
- The Justice System
- Coming Attractions
- Yield To Fish
- Yosemite Sam
- Naval Supremacy
- Harvest Moon and the Weather
- Thoughts Of Summer
- Alaska Is To Blame
- Arctic Polar Pig
- Happy Anniversary
-
▼
October
(25)
Total Pageviews
VIisitors
Live Traffic Feed
My Blog List
-
-22°F in Deadhorse, AK8 years ago
-
Elk In The Rut12 years ago
-
-
Winter 2012 (March)12 years ago
-
-
No Need To Apologize13 years ago
-
-
-
-
What Is In A Name14 years ago
-
OK HERE I AM15 years ago
-
soooo many dogs16 years ago